001
Case Study · DELIVERED

E4 Engineering · Harvey Mudd College · Jan → May 2024

Universal Antenna Remounting System

★ Davies Engineering Prize

Quick-swap antenna mounting for satellite and drone GPS tracking on a motorized telescope mount, engineered to ±0.1 mm positional accuracy with GD&T tolerancing.

±0.1mm
positional accuracy, GD&T-toleranced
2antenna types
parabolic + arrow, swappable in minutes
2024Davies Prize
awarded by the Engineering Dept.
My role

I designed and prototyped the system in SolidWorks, engineered the radio-transparent CFRP joints and CNC-machined aluminum interfaces, and ran the project timeline with Gantt charts, daily stand-ups, and meeting minutes to hit on-time delivery.

TimelineJan → May 2024
Team4 · E4 project team
ClientProf. Jason Gallicchio
AdvisorProf. Qimin Yang
MaterialsCFRP · Nylon · PVC · 6061 Al
ProcessesCFRP 3D printing · CNC · GD&T
Final E4 prototype of the Universal Antenna Remounting System, fully assembled.
FIG. 01Final E4 prototype of the Universal Antenna Remounting System, fully assembled.

Our client needed to track satellites and drones with multiple antennas, a parabolic dish and arrow-style units, all driven by one motorized telescope mount (an iOptron AZ Mount Pro). Nothing on the market attached them. Existing options lacked modularity, precision, and field usability.

Our four-person E4 team delivered the Universal Antenna Remounting System: a modular attachment stack that swaps antennas in minutes while holding ±0.1 mm positional accuracy through GD&T tolerancing. The Engineering Department awarded the project the Davies Engineering Prize.

01
Problem & constraints

Problem & constraints

The client had no reliable way to mount antennas on the telescope, and the research happens in the field. Antennas have to swap in minutes without a machine shop, fit two antenna types today, and scale to whatever comes next.

  • Sturdiness: survive handling, transport, and repeated field use
  • Ease of attachment: full antenna swap within minutes
  • Adaptability: modular interfaces that extend to future antennas
  • Signal integrity: no interfering material inside the antenna read zone
iOptron AZ Mount Pro motorized telescope mount.
FIG. 02iOptron AZ Mount Pro motorized telescope mount.
Arrow-head antenna module.
FIG. 03Arrow-head antenna module.
02
Design

Design

We sketched and iterated several geometries for modularity and balance, then modeled every component in SolidWorks. Material selection split the assembly into two regimes: radio-transparent CFRP, nylon, and PVC anywhere near the antenna read zone, and CNC-machined aluminum at the high-stress telescope interface.

We also wrote the evaluation plan up front instead of after the fact: structured test protocols with objective scoring for sturdiness, compactness, usability, and adaptability.

Modular joint design in SolidWorks.
FIG. 04Modular joint design in SolidWorks.
Telescope-mount sleeve in SolidWorks.
FIG. 05Telescope-mount sleeve in SolidWorks.
03
Fabrication

Fabrication

Each subsystem got the process its loads and RF constraints demanded:

  • Antenna-to-PVC joint: carbon-fiber 3D printed for strength at low weight, with nylon bolts for quick swaps and antenna rotation
  • Parabolic antenna attachment: CFRP-printed adapter panel, slim enough for compact storage, bolted for detachability
  • Telescope mount piece and sleeve: CNC-machined aluminum with threaded rods, counterbalance support, and engraved branding
  • PVC beam joint: chemically bonded elbow plus fasteners for structural stability
CFRP 3D-printed antenna joint.
FIG. 06CFRP 3D-printed antenna joint.
Machining the aluminum mount sleeve.
FIG. 07Machining the aluminum mount sleeve.
04
Testing & verification

Testing & verification

Every prototype was scored against the design objectives with structured tests:

  • Sturdiness: intended-use cycling, drop tests, and deflection measurements
  • Compactness: measured volume and height against storage requirements
  • Ease of use: timed attach and detach trials with E4 peers
  • Signal integrity: verified no interfering materials in the antenna read zone
  • Rotation: confirmed orientation adjustment for antenna polarization
  • Adaptability: interview-based assessment of future antenna integration
Timed attach and detach usability trials.
FIG. 08Timed attach and detach usability trials.
Rotation and polarization verification.
FIG. 09Rotation and polarization verification.
05
Outcome

Outcome

We delivered a field-ready modular mounting system. Antenna swaps take minutes, setup time dropped, and nothing in the load path gives up sturdiness or signal clarity. The interfaces are sized to accept future antennas, and the Engineering Department awarded the project the Davies Engineering Prize.

Delivered system assembled on the telescope mount.
FIG. 10Delivered system assembled on the telescope mount.
06
Lessons & next steps

Lessons & next steps

This project put real hours into carbon-fiber 3D printing, CNC aluminum machining, designing to GD&T tolerances, and writing structured evaluation protocols for prototypes.

Given another iteration, I would refine the quick-release mechanisms and add automated alignment feedback to speed up field deployment.

TeamThiven Anderson · Ever Diaz-Ramos · Kaden Cassidy
AdvisorProf. Qimin Yang
ClientProf. Jason Gallicchio